Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
Can We, "Overcome EVIL by GOOD." Rom. 12:21,
by Tutor Turtle
11:05 AM
Atemporal Universe?
by Zephir
08:53 AM
What is the ultimate aim of science?
by redewenur
03:12 AM
http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=28418#Post28418
by shoes
02:18 AM
http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=28417#Post28417
by shoes
02:17 AM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
The universe as magic roundabout
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Bionics
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2008 News

Rusty's Reading List
Sci Books
Join Rusty Rockets for the lowdown on what you should be reading.
Archives
2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


7 August 2008
Quantum "Uncollapse" Muddies Definition Of Reality
by Kate Melville

Quantum theory says that quantum particles have wave-like properties and can exist in many places at once. Why the objects we see around us every day — in what physicists call the classical world — don't behave this way despite being made of these very same quantum particles is a deep and fundamental question in modern physics.

Measuring (observing) a quantum object supposedly forces it to collapse from a waveform into one position. This collapse, according to quantum mechanics dogma, is what makes objects "real," but new verification of "collapse reversal" suggests that we can no longer assume that measurements alone create reality. It was back in 2006 that physicist Andrew Jordan, at the University of Rochester, together with Alexander Korotkov, at the University of California, Riverside, first mooted the possibility of collapse reversal.

Until then, it was believed that the instant a quantum object was measured it would "collapse" from being in all the locations it could be, to just one location like a classical object. But Jordan proposed that it would be possible to weakly measure the particle continuously, partially collapsing the quantum state, and then "unmeasure" it, causing the particle to revert back to its original quantum form, before it collapsed. Jordan's hypothesis suggests that the line between the quantum and classical worlds is not as sharply defined as had been long thought, but that it is rather a gray area that takes time to cross.

Now, in Nature News, Postdoctoral Fellow Nadav Katz explains how his team put the idea to the test and found that, indeed, it is possible to take a "weak" measurement of a quantum particle, triggering a partial collapse. Katz then "undid the damage," altering certain properties of the particle and performing the same weak measurement again. The particle was returned to its original quantum state just as if no measurement had ever been taken.

Katz contends being able to reverse the collapse "tells us that we really can't assume that measurements create reality because it is possible to erase the effects of a measurement and start again."

Related:
Physicists Create Quantum-Entangled Images
Real-World Quantum Effects Demonstrated
Quantum Computer Computes, While Not Operating

Source: University of Rochester



            

Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.